Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Immersion Games

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. -- Scott (talk) 04:33, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Immersion Games[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. My WP:BEFORE search brings nothing. Issues are there for 8 years now. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 17:36, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:23, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:23, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There are definite mentions in the VGSE, and that's just in English. I don't think this is a good target for deletion. Not a keep, but not a delete either. --Izno (talk) 20:00, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:35, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:35, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:23, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg jhp jm 06:12, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree with nom, I cannot locate any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability, fails WP:NCORP and GNG. HighKing⁺⁺ 17:07, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment To add my comment on the Izno's post, companies are held to a bigger standards per WP:CORPDEPTH. It is just not a notable company. Those are the links I have found as well, which are:
1. https://www.ign.com/articles/2008/08/04/immersion-games-annouces-new-studio is a PR piece (has even their email posted!)
2. https://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/immersion-games-expansion-co-developer-of-cellfactor-and-monster-madness-opens-mexico-studio Press release which is not independent of the company
3. https://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/110648/Immersion_Games_Expands_in_Mexico.php It is not in depth of the company which fails WP:SIGCOV and I am pretty much sure it is based on the press release posted at *2. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 19:13, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.