Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imia Fleur Edwards

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 06:31, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Imia Fleur Edwards[edit]

Non-notable, despite the entry's proclamations. Her only IMDB credit is this - [1].

Delete per nom JackO'Lantern 22:09, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!
—Encephalon 06:31, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable actor, only 165 google results [2] --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 06:53, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not every real actor is notable. Henning Makholm 07:09, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: does not meet WP:BIO. --Hetar 07:23, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non-notable actor per WP:BIO. --Kinu ^t/_c 07:39, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not very notable. feydey 12:39, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete, not notable presently, but doesn't mean this is not to change. --Soumyasch 12:41, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, non-negligible IMDB entry and nontrivial stage credits. Clearly more notable than Air Force Amy and Ewa Sonnet, and not much less notable than Matsumoto Marika, who's a nearly unanimous keep right now. Monicasdude 14:33, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Arbusto 06:59, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.