Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imayam TV
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete for lack of notability, even after taking the new source into account. Deryck C. 23:41, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Imayam TV (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Zero refs. Zero ELs. There is one article in The Hindu, but other than that I've only found trivial passing mention in RSs, and few of those. Appears to fail to meet our notability requirements. Created by a 1-edit-only-ever SPA. Epeefleche (talk) 07:26, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:42, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:42, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Reference added:
- Subramanian, Karthik (Mar 22, 2006). "`Imayam' TV channel to be launched". The Hindu. Retrieved January 17, 2012.
{{cite web}}: External link in|publisher=|publisher=(help)
- Subramanian, Karthik (Mar 22, 2006). "`Imayam' TV channel to be launched". The Hindu. Retrieved January 17, 2012.
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 14:21, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 10:48, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no indication of notability. . . Mean as custard (talk) 16:45, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The one reference is very short, consisting mostly of a rehashed press-release. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 11:40, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.