Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imagine In Cornice

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (non-admin closure), with nearly unanimous keep/merge comments. The possibility of merging is left open to editors. Skomorokh 16:43, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Imagine In Cornice[edit]

Delete: Fails WP:RS and WP:N. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 22:17, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above - it does indeed fail WP:RS and WP:NOTE. --Shruti14 ^{t c s} 22:38, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with discography or Pearl Jam. Also, while the article desperately needs to be expanded, there is [1] which is slightly notable, although, I do not believe this is enough. Fails WP:MUSIC for albums. Wisdom89 _{(_T / ^C)} 22:53, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge this is not notable on its own, but would be notable information in the Pearl Jam article.Kuro Woof 00:17, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Merge to Pearl Jam as this is useful info but sufficient notability for a unique article is not asserted or likely at this time. - Dravecky (talk) 05:22, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Unfortunately I cant review the following pages at the moment, but this looks very promising, as does this. Add to that that it's a gold record, and I believe independent notability is established. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 07:24, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.