Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imaginative (album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 03:18, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Imaginative (album)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It may have an article on Swidish Wikipedia but it has no more sources there than here. The album is not notable and fails any notability criteria. The AllMusic entry is not a review, only a track listing [1]. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:28, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Nordic Dragon 09:04, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Nordic Dragon 09:04, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete lacks significant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:44, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as I think it passes WP:GNG, found some reviews here [2] , [3] , [4], [5] there were more , including Japanese, more German. Atlantic306 (talk) 01:38, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Seaoftranquility.org is not a reliable source.^{Sources to avoid} The reliability of DPRP is disputed.^{Is DPRP reliable?·DPRP.net as a review source} Progwereld doesn't seem reliable to me either. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:08, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:15, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the link, the trouble with the list of RS is that it has hardly any non-english language sources which would be helpful for an album like this. Sea of Tranquility is on the avoid list but the other three references are not, including powermetal.de, they all seem to have a reasonably lengthy history and a dedicated staff, the dutch site has not been put on the avoid list at present.. Atlantic306 (talk) 17:42, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as this, all in all, is still questionable for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 05:36, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:54, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:02, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:07, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.