Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imaginary cookies
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete' Mifter (talk) 00:17, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Imaginary cookies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
PRODded as having no real sources (mathematical joke) to indicate notability. Author removed PROD, saying "There are no sources that can be quoted. Except maybe my blog." Fails WP:V, WP:N, WP:NFT. JohnCD (talk) 14:07, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Imaginary cookies were invented in 2006 by a group of friends in Finland. While infinitesimally tiny cookies may be a worthwhile subject, these are not. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:29, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:MADEUP --Pontificalibus (talk) 16:54, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Per WP:MADEUP. Joe Chill (talk) 20:48, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh those wacky Finnish students! What will they think of next? delete. Mandsford (talk) 21:02, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
yummydelete non notable neologism, the article practically states that --UltraMagnusspeak 21:17, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]- Delete. This is a blatant case of madeupitis. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 21:52, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete Seems like this kind of thing ought to be speediable as nonsense. Ben Kidwell (talk) 23:32, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Problem here is that it's not actual nonsense, Ben. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 22:19, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the feedback. To me this seems like "incoherent text or gibberish with no meaningful content or history" and the term "nonsense" is often used in everyday speech to label things that may be grammatical but are free of any substance. Regardless, I'm not currently doing any deletion noms, just comments on AfDs, so my broad interpretation of nonsense to include "silly things made up in school" won't victimize any content. Ben Kidwell (talk) 23:58, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Problem here is that it's not actual nonsense, Ben. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 22:19, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as something made up in school one day. Exit2DOS • Ctrl • Alt • Del 01:00, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.