Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imagen Ltd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:13, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Imagen Ltd[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't find sources to support notability, WP:ORG or WP:GNG, either under Imagen Ltd or its former name, Cambridge Imaging Systems, primarily press releases and public relations. Several awards had been listed in the article, but they seem to have been non-notable run-of-the-mill industry awards. Largoplazo (talk) 16:47, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. Largoplazo (talk) 16:47, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Largoplazo (talk) 16:47, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Largoplazo (talk) 16:47, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Covert advertising, except that it's not very covert. The sources in the article are press releases; I can find no sourcing at all which even gots close to WP:NCORP standards. Girth Summit _(blether) 17:36, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree with Nom, as I was searching for confirmation of the information, that I eventually removed, I did not find any WP:RS to justify notability of this organization. VViking_TalkEdits 22:25, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It would be great if the page didn't get deleted, the purpose of changes were to include our newest product and ensure a true reflection of the company - no changes were carried out maliciously. I would like the chance to review the page with WP:NCORP standards in mind. I understand most comments and will rectify within these standards.Sallen888.sa (talk) 07:53, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your remarks demonstrate that you should not be editing this article, even if it remains. See the guidelines on conflicts of interest and the use of Wikipedia for promotional purposes. Wikipedia articles are not to be used as a web presence for their subjects. The additions you've made that I and another editor have removed were inappropriate. All that aside, articles may only be about subjects that meet the notability guidelines, which I have asserted Imagen Ltd does not. Preventing the article's deletion will require the discussion to conclude that the article is notable, but evidence would have to be presented to support that outcome. You're welcome to submit such evidence if you find it, but you'll have to make that case while this discussion remains open. Largoplazo (talk) 11:39, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this one now that the litany of products was removed, not much else except funding. This got my interest because a similarly-name company (now defunct, no relation to this one) was started by some of my colleagues Les Earnest and Luis Trabb-Pardo (credited with the TPK algorithm) back in the 1980s. W Nowicki (talk) 16:50, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No indications of notability, Wikipedia is not a marketing or advertising platform, nor the Yellow Pages. I am unable to locate any references that meet NCORP criteria for establishing notability. HighKing⁺⁺ 21:24, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.