Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Image song

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) TBrandley ^{(what's up)} 00:11, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image song

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The original concern of the PROD was "While this is a topic that does exist, the article is full of original research and the only references in use are to show the charting information for the K-On! songs." I'm taking this to AfD since I believe that this PROD could possibly be controversial since there are sources in the article, and also because I want a wider hearing for this article. I have no particular opinion on this article; as such, I abstain and state that my opinion is neutral. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:21, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. --Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:23, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep? Looks like an useful enclyclopedic article on an enclyclopedic topic. Has no wp:notability references/sources but I found some immediately in a search and so they exist. North8000 (talk) 11:32, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Will you provide on the article talk page all these links you found? ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 18:18, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
tentative keep Searching Anime News Network shows the term is used. What we need is someplace to source the definition from. Mangoe (talk) 14:56, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep If its a real thing, it should have an article. We need the encyclopedia is complete as possible. And you shouldn't bring something to AFD unless you believe it should be deleted. Otherwise, you are just wasting everyone's time. Dream Focus 01:38, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:59, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.