Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Igor Kogan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:26, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Igor Kogan[edit]

Igor Kogan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not passing WP:ANYBIO; deputies of the banks are not notable. looks like advertisement. WP:PROMO, cross-wiki spam. Russian Wikipedia is marked as Undisclosed paid editing and is being AfDed https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%B0%D0%BD,_%D0%98%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%8C_%D0%92%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87 Oliver Virk (talk) 11:12, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Russia. Shellwood (talk) 12:00, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Does not pass WP:GNG and looks like an advert. Fad Ariff (talk) 12:10, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete agree with analysis above, paid editing is a concern. Oaktree b (talk) 12:37, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Pass WP:GNG. The person made Nordea Bank Russia the most reliable in Russia. In addition, he developed the legal framework for the Credit Bureau, which is an integral part of the Russian financial market. He also made a significant contribution to the work of Aeroflot. All this is confirmed by publications in independent media. In Russian Wikipedia, as far as I can see, the article was also removed from deletion as significant. The result was challenged not for reasons of significance, but because of a possible internal conflict. ЖуковАФ (talk) 10:31, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 13:11, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, the person is notable. The conclusion follows from the section about Nordea Bank (during the Kogan period: Nordea Bank had become the most stable bank in Russia by Forbes magazine rating; Nordea Bank’s position in Forbes Top 20 banking list of Russia, etc). Many authoritative sources are presented. But I recommend edit the article more so that it does not look like an advertisement. 94.25.174.126 (talk) 00:11, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ks0stm (TCGE) 13:46, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. What a hot mess of spam and in 2022, everyone knows we are not a free web host. You can't just slap up random citations and extravagant claims now like folks did in 2007. Bearian (talk) 14:53, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, I was not able to find any significant coverage, the only sources available were Kogan being quoted by media outlets, not actually being covered by them. Devonian Wombat (talk) 23:17, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.