Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Igor Kenk (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:11, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Igor Kenk[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person. Fails GNG. WP:NOTNEWSPAPER Appealcourt (talk) 04:45, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 01:10, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - "special article" yes but he is a noted bicycle thief so its a definite keep. Also per previous AfD.--BabbaQ (talk) 15:04, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The subject receives significant coverage in independent reliable sources, primarily in Canada but also in the US and UK. I also found mentions in sources from Pakistan and Slovenia. Location (talk) 16:43, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - His antics have garnered him significant coverage that takes him beyond the average perp. -- Whpq (talk) 17:24, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.