Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Igor Aleksovski
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:20, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
- Igor Aleksovski (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by an IP without providing a reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:04, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:05, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played or managed senior international football nor played or managed in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 16:24, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
- Deletw - fails WP:NFOOTBALL having never played in a fully professional league or a senior international fixture and does not have enough significant coverage to pass WP:GNG. Kosack (talk) 16:27, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:05, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Macedonia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:05, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 17:34, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete does not pass WP:NFOOTBALL or WP:GNG at this time Atlantic306 (talk) 18:03, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.