Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/If You Tickle Us

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:41, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If You Tickle Us[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:COATRACK article of a blog compiled from mostly brief mentions about a Rabbi's sexual assault scandal. Searching didn't turn up anything helpful other than some more brief mentions. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 22:10, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion, Judaism, Internet, Websites, and United Kingdom. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 22:10, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:36, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:10, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nomination. Clear-cut case of WP:COATRACK. TH1980 (talk) 01:38, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. No evidence of notability for the blog itself. Tacyarg (talk) 21:38, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.