Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Identified (Vanessa Hudgens song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 19:20, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Identified (Vanessa Hudgens song)[edit]

Apparent hoax article. Song is certainly a real track, but no reliable sources for the information here. No sources in article. I can't find any official sources supporting any of the release information. The cover at the time I am nominating this is a cover I have already nominated for deletion as a hoax, as it falsely claims to be the cover of the Japanese album, not the American single. When the article was created, it was created with a fan-art cover found here..—Kww(talk) 11:42, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I couldn't find any reliable sources to verify what's written here. This is the only reliable looking website that outright says that Identified in the next single (says it is in Cosmo Girl magazine), but it's vague. I can't find any official information backing up any of the claims in the article. Bill ^{(talk|contribs)} 12:13, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is obviously fake. The single cover is obviously fan made and it's different from Hudgens' other singles, since she uses CENTURY GOTHIC. And there aren't any sources available. And it peaked at number 98, for your information. Kikkokalabud (talk) 14:42, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Bogus chart positions, totally incorrect info all about. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 19:15, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fake or not, there's the issue of WP:CRYSTAL.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:06, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Good song, but isn't need this song have her own page. You can't look for a reference. Like Fabrictramp said, there's the issue of WP:CRYSTAL.--Pedrovip | talk to me 16:14, 12 October 2008

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.