Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Idea Informer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:49, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Idea Informer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is insufficient reliable third-party coverage to establish notability. sst^flyer 16:39, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. sst^flyer 17:57, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree with nom.New Media Theorist (talk) 18:14, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable. Carax (talk) 18:34, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Notability just isn't established. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 22:41, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as there's simply no good coverage yet (my searches found nothing good) but feel free to draft and userfy if needed. SwisterTwister talk 05:12, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:18, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Given the consensus that we already have, this looks like a 'snow delete' situation. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 22:27, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Perhaps the AFD discussion template needs a "snowball" button.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.