Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ichiji Tasaki
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was I should not be allowed to use Google. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 22:25, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ichiji Tasaki[edit]
- Ichiji Tasaki (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Only primary sources. Search for secondary sources found nothing of note. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 18:55, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 19:13, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 19:14, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The first page of a standard google search brings these to attention:
- this tribute to Tasaki from Congressman Chris van Hollen,
- A five-page long article on Tasaki from the Washington Post following Tasaki's death, and
- This biography from the National Institute of Health on Tasaki's legacy.
- His neurological work is also discussed in this NPR story. I have added these sources to the article and I ask that the nomination be closed if the nominator is satisfied. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 19:41, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep Notability is clear and secondary sources are easily identified. I found the same Washington Post obit and I'll add this from NPR.Novangelis (talk) 19:47, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Mea culpa: I missed that the NPR story was also listed.Novangelis (talk) 19:50, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.