Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ian Ostlund

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 00:07, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ian Ostlund

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a particular notable former minor league baseball player. The first half of his references have to deal with his amateur career and the other half are WP:ROUTINE. In fact, at least one of the references mainly focuses on another player and mentions Ostlund in just a little blurb. A large chunk of his article focuses on his high school career, and his high school career isn't notable enough to merit an article, in my opinion (his amateur career takes up about half the article). The article as a whole doesn't really establish notability. Alex (talk) 15:49, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. —Alex (talk) 15:50, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — -- Cirt (talk) 16:15, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:35, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:18, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable, fails GNG. Sourcing exists, but it is routine in nature. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:43, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It's my understanding that minor league service doesn't make a person notable, and there's nothing else here. --Coemgenus (talk) 10:56, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.