Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ian Coate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:13, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ian Coate[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:BIO and WP:ARTIST. ttonyb (talk) 15:03, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:45, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:45, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:45, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:46, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy deletion per nom. Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 19:16, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - in the absence of any reliable sources this artist appears non-notable per policy cited in nomination and WP:MILMOS/N. Anotherclown (talk) 22:47, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I don't think there is sufficient coverage to satisfy WP:BIO. AustralianRupert (talk) 01:41, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.