Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iain McGuinness

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:39, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Iain McGuinness

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blatant vanity bio. Appears to have a lot of sources, yet none demonstrate depth of coverage whatsoever (one reference, for example, does nothing other than quote him along with several other randomly chosen readers, on how they like the newspaper's new layout). Prod was disputed, most likely by subject. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:08, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - To clear GNG there must be multiple, independent, published sources about the subject in so-called "reliable sources." I'm not seeing any. Carrite (talk) 22:45, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:37, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:37, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:37, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:AUTHOR and WP:BK. Qworty (talk) 09:24, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Week Delete Article doesn't contain enough reliable references. Over bombarded with repeated refs. Mizziman (talk) 21:02, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.