Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Wish I Were Stephanie V

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 17:48, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I Wish I Were Stephanie V[edit]

I Wish I Were Stephanie V (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG, and N - community tv distribution, no national coverage, weak sourcing Atsme 💬 📧 15:58, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi, Artw - I Googled it and didn't find anything that was notable, even if it qualified as a specialty award. If you can find something notable about it, I would not object to withdrawing this AfD. Atsme 💬 📧 18:53, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep. The Indiefest Best of Show is worth something, though the article could surely use some expansion though. I have now added some more sources to the article as well. Davidgoodheart (talk) 00:37, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep. I also think the Indifest award, along with coverage in the United States and Australia is mildly notable. This is "weak" because I haven't seen much else, but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist.--Eastview2018 (talk) 18:30, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 03:59, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep passing WP:NF, per received award by international coverage. Brayan ocaner (talk) 22:19, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Spam from the films producer. Non notable film. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Award is not major, it comes from yet another award farm. duffbeerforme (talk) 03:37, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, as the award is enough to show notability, combined with the coverage. Jackattack1597 (talk) 02:02, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No, that award is simply not enough. Indie Fest (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indie Fest) is not notable. Their vanity awards (given out multiple times a year in large numbers) are not credible. There is no way known that they could be called a major award. duffbeerforme (talk) 04:49, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
For those claiming it has sufficient coverage, where is it? There is nothing good in the article itself and no one has identified a single source that provides the film any level of coverage in an independent reliable source. duffbeerforme (talk) 23:24, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to further evaluate if significant coverage exists beyond the award of questionable significance.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwaiiplayer (talk) 13:12, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 02:24, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete The sourcing fails to demonstrate sufficient, lasting, third-party independent WP:SIGCOV to warrant an article. ——Serial 14:36, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:NFILM. Lacks independent coverage. Awards were won at minor festivals that themselves fail wikipedia's notability criteria. IndieFest gives out awards three times a year, and is not covered in independent reliable sources.4meter4 (talk) 21:46, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.