Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Want You Back (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was WP:DRAFTIFY. The article is now located at Draft:I Want You Back (film). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:13, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I Want You Back (film)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NFF, there is not significant coverage of the film, there was a burst of articles all based on the same press release that were published at (almost) the same time, but the film has had no other coverage, and the published info was all mundane production details (cast and crew involved), this should not constitute as significant coverage BOVINEBOY2008 23:40, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Well, I differ with your deletion proposal since it will be distributed worldwide by Amazon Studios, in addition to having several well-known actors in its cast. The fact that there are not so many articles related to the film yet does not mean that it is not remarkable. In any case, I would be more in agreement with it being moved to a draft. Bruno Rene Vargas (talk) 00:19, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:19, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify Has potential to be notable once it is released. Donaldd23 (talk) 10:33, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify. This needs just a little bit more to really help give notability. The coverage is limited to pretty much a single press release - if you compare the text in the Deadline and THR sources you'll see that the text is pretty much identical for the most part. If there was a news article (as opposed to an industry listing) confirming that production had started and said something at least somewhat unique about the filming, then this might be a bit different. There's just not really enough here. This will very likely become notable once it releases, but we can't guarantee that at this point in time. It's still possible that this will release and gain no coverage that would establish notability or that something will happen to grind production to a halt. It's less likely that this will happen with mainstream fare with (I presume) a fairly large budget than say, an indie or niche genre production but it does happen. I'd just like there to be a wee bit more coverage than a small flurry of coverage based on a single press release, as otherwise this would just be prone to re-nomination for AfD in a month or a couple of weeks if/when more coverage doesn't come about. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 12:36, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.