Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Wanna Be the Guy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:17, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I Wanna Be the Guy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most of the reviews cited seem to be personal websites or possibly unreliable sources. I don't see much, if anything, in the way of notability here; no non-trivial coverage to be found. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 04:32, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MuZemike 17:42, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – gNews brings up at least a few reliable sources that can establish some notability. MuZemike 17:45, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I found only false positives. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 19:39, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a source from Shacknews, ZDnet (Belgium), The Sacramento Bee (print only), and a little bit in Ars Technica. That's what I got from the gNews search. On the regular Google search, Destructoid has a little on the game. It was listed by the Independent Games Summit as the 17th best freeware platformer of 2008 here. MuZemike 22:01, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 22:08, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There are enough hits in gNews to establish notability, if only by the skin of its teeth. Lithorien (talk) 02:04, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.