Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Thought I Lost You (song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. unanimous opinion that it meets WP:NSONGS, even by the nominator (non-admin closure) RadioFan (talk) 16:15, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I Thought I Lost You (song)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This song does not warrant an article. It does pass WP:NSONGS because it was nominated for a Golden Globe Award but nothing else gives it enough third party notability for an article of its own. ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 01:02, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:05, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:10, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The nomination acknowledges that it meets the notability requirement per WP:NSONGS. The article also references a few independent sources. Rlendog (talk) 20:50, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 14:59, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep By the paradoxical arguement of the nominator! It's notable, it has an article. Lugnuts (talk) 17:43, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep The article meets WP:NSONGS, but not for the reason the nominator mentions. WP:NSONGS confers notabilty only on songs which have charted or those that have won major awards, not just nominated. This song is notable because it has received sufficient coverage in 3rd party sources. RadioFan (talk) 16:11, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.