Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Love Earth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 11:48, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I Love Earth[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 18:01, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 18:02, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional piece on an organisation that does not show how it is notable. It lacks coverage in independent reliable sources (WP:ORG). Was created with multiple references but they were for the most part deceptive. Most did not verify claims made or are not independent reliable sources or were just links to organisations homepages. One is dead but a look at the link suggests more of the same problems. Given the deceptive and promotional nature of this article and the lack of independent coverage about I Love Earth this article should be deleted. (Note that this is one of multiple deceptively sourced articles by a blocked spammer creating a walled garden around Liana Werner-Gray). duffbeerforme (talk) 07:16, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Part of a self-promotion cluster that must be nipped in the bud. All citations are pretty much self-referential, and there is nothing that actually establishes notability. complainer (talk) 10:50, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 01:03, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Seems extremely for promotion purposes and very little WP:RS. Zappa O Mati 03:08, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.