Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Heart Movies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. ✗plicit 01:25, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I Heart Movies[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Television station lacks in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG. Perhaps a redirect to GMA Network might be an WP:ATD? MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:21, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:21, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Philippines. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:39, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to GMA Network (company)#I Heart Movies: per nom. ThisIsSeanJ (talk) 12:24, 29 April 2023 (UTC) Keep Founded sources for the article: [1] [2]. ThisIsSeanJ (talk) 12:31, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets WP:NTV and WP:GNG with sources presented by SeanJ. They're reliable and in-depth enough IMV. SBKSPP (talk) 00:31, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 14:33, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to GMA Network. Both the existing sources and the articles listed above read quite like promotional pieces, especially with links to the channel itself at the end of the reportings. Other news articles that I found are pretty similar in tones as the ones above. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 19:56, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 00:26, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Article is good enough to pass WP:GNG and WP:NTV with reliable sources indicated by ThisIsSeanJ, as well as the ones in the article. ASTIG 😎🙃 01:30, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

— Note: An editor has expressed a concern that Superastig (talk • contribs) has been canvassed to this discussion. (diff) JoelleJay (talk) 01:56, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as it's sourced well and deletion isn't being asked for. Nate • (chatter) 04:26, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.