Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Didn't Do It (TV Series)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WP:CRYSTAL does not apply here as this is not unverifiable speculation, and the "keep" arguments are stronger on notability. postdlf (talk) 22:36, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I Didn't Do It (TV series)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:CRYSTAL. All I could find were announcements that Disney had ordered the series, and that people were cast. No in-depth analysis from reliable sources, or anything else to suggest that at this time, the subject is notable. Also, WP:NFF, while about film articles, makes a good paint when it states: "Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles, as budget issues, scripting issues and casting issues can interfere with a project well ahead of its intended filming date. The assumption should also not be made that because a film is likely to be a high-profile release it will be immune to setbacks—there is no "sure thing" production." I would argue that applies here as well. — Preceding signed comment added by Cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 03:54, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 04:39, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete An order announcement has been made, nothing else. CRYSTAL and WP:TOOSOON. Nate • (chatter) 05:59, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets WP:GNG. Sufficient coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject for a stub at least. It is not WP:CRYSTAL as there is an official announcement. Not WP:TOSOON now as now sufficient secondary sources for an article - it was when only the pilot was announced, a pickup is significant. We have well-referenced info on cast and crew and a production schedule. Pickup was announced yesterday but ghits show interest from sources we can't use as references. This is a valid use of a stub. Let this article grow. Tag it as requiring references but that should be all that is done. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:53, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Same as User:Geraldo Perez. References are all there, cast is there, announcement is made. Meets WP:N and WP:FICTION. WP:CRYSTAL does not apply as there is an official, reliable sourced announcement on its production. Jguy _Talk^Done 17:54, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete I'm not sure what planet anyone else is on, but WP:CRYSTAL is very clear in this case. There is NO current sign that this show is notable whatsoever - its existence or future existence does not guarantee notability. Let me re-emhpasize: existence is NOT the same notability (✉→BWilkins←✎) 10:49, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is notable because reliable secondary sources have taken note of it with more than passing mention. That is basic criteria for inclusion. Also it is guaranteed that this show will remain notable as it is being broadcast on a major network. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:13, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per WP:CRYSTAL, obviously. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:32, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In what way does WP:CRYSTAL apply here? This is no speculation or prediction - a pickup has been announced, it is listed as an upcoming show on a major network, it is referenced that this show will be broadcast and that production has begun. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:13, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It is sourced across the board — the show, production, and actors. — Wylie pedia 10:22, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.