Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Adapt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:02, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I Adapt[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 17:34, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notability (or lack thereof). The adjectives used herein suggest puffery, and the absence of reputable or independent references does no good to establish this band's impact. The albums too are without references or statements as to their importance. Qwerty Binary (talk) 16:39, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iceland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:30, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete but I'm open to arguments; inclusion under WP:MUSIC 7 seems possible if we can find some reliable sources (i.e. something in the Icelandic press attesting their importance to the scene - not self-published stuff or webzines). As it stands, there's not enough verifiable information to support notability. COI is also a concern. ✤ Fosse 8 ✤ 13:57, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Not a vote, but the link here from the article itself appears to be a broken redlink. Can this be fixed? We're possibly missing out on valuable contributions to this discussion. ✤ Fosse 8 ✤ 13:57, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete basically per Fosse8. Also worth looking at bundling in the articles on the albums. --j⚛e decker ^talk 16:39, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The best I could find are these sources. Any more? Gongshow ^Talk 10:19, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 05:52, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSpecialUser ^TSU 01:50, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.