Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IVocalize

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:26, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

IVocalize

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotion for non-notable software company. No reliable sources are given, and I have been unable to find any such coverage. Haakon (talk) 17:21, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete Why AfD? Surely SD for non-notability - or possibly even for spam, but this is marginal. Only non-company link is Kolabora, and "Kolabora is an independent forum about online collaboration" (quoted from http://www.kolabora.com/about.htm ). Peridon (talk) 18:08, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I try not to overuse speedy deletion. There may be sources about this company that I have not found. Haakon (talk) 18:16, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Looks like attempt to promote non-notable company. Calltech (talk) 22:51, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:30, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:30, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. Doesn't seem to reach company notability. LotLE×talk 00:58, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.