Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ITKO

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:27, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITKO[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advert for defunct company; heavily sourced to press releases Orange Mike | Talk 03:48, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Software. Orange Mike | Talk 03:48, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:27, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Aside from routine company inception and takeover information, the article text at outset and now is largely about iTKO's LISA testing product, which, following a series of acquisitions, is now part of Broadcom's DevTest Portfolio [1]. Searches are not finding evidence of attained notability for the former firm or for the product. AllyD (talk) 11:53, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I can't seem to find anything useful on the company, but the product may be notable:

MacVittie, Lori. Lisa: More Than a Pretty Face. Network Computing. 2006;17(22):36–38. (I don't have access to this but according to the abstract, it's a full-length review.)
Cithan, Rick. LISA Smiles on J2EE App Testers. InfoWorld. 2005;27(2):25–26. (This one is available via EBSCOhost.)
Pollice, Gary. LISA 2.5. Software Development. 2005;13(6):44. ISSN 1070-8588 (Couldn't find this online either, the journal's title is hardly helpful in that.)

Maybe this could be spun off into an article on that, but that would require someone who could get the sources. Failing that, my !vote is delete. -- Maddy from Celeste (WAVEDASH) 16:06, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.