Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ISouljaBoyTellEm
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete per CSD:G4. Stifle (talk) 15:32, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- ISouljaBoyTellEm (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unsourced claims, WP:CRYSTAL Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 21:20, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per the nominator, WP:CRYSTAL is a valid assessment. JBsupreme (talk) 05:23, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:17, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails notability per WP:CRYSTAL & WP:MUSIC#Albums. Even if it was released, it would still fail notability for lacking "significant independent coverage in reliable sources". Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 12:28, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:MUSIC#Albums (and WP:V). —Hello, Control Hello, Tony 16:21, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unsourced, WP:CRYSTAL. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 16:24, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above, fails the albums guideline for WP:MUSIC plus crystal ball issues. RFerreira (talk) 20:16, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails per the above discussions. No verifiable information or sources, WP:CRYSTAL. SchfiftyThree 21:41, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: Added a few references. Still in dire need of them, though. --EoL talk 01:34, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I believe this has been deleted before. See WP:Articles for deletion/ISouljaBoy(album) and others. Warrants a G4? TN‑X-Man 14:10, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I have tagged this as G4, recreation of AfD material. If others would please review, that would be great. Thanks! TN‑X-Man 14:50, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.