Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ISS Enterprise (Star Trek)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge and Redirect (Non-admin closure). Seddσn ^talk ^{Editor Review} 18:46, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ISS Enterprise (Star Trek)[edit]

This article asserts no notability through reliable sources, and is just an in-universe repetition of the plot of several mirror universe episodes. As this information is already covered by those episode articles this is duplicative and should be deleted Judgesurreal777 (talk) 05:16, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for lack of notability as an in-universe article or Redirect to USS_Enterprise_(NCC-1701). Mh29255 (talk) 07:24, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with redirect, but to Starship Enterprise, where a brief section on the two mirror ships would fit reasonably well. Although a case could be made for redirecting to Mirror, Mirror (Star Trek), the older and presumably more notable episode with a mirror Enterprise, it featured in the other episode as a mirror of Enterprise (NX-01). Gimmetrow 07:50, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect per Gimmetrow. The "Star Trek: Enterprise" section could be merged into In a Mirror Darkly (Enterprise episode). Think outside the box 10:26, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 16:32, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect per Gimmetrow. Has no independent notability, and can flesh out the other article. Dloh cierekim 23:55, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Merge to USS Enterprise. It's just a redundant article of plot details mentioned elsewhere. RobJ1981 (talk) 02:00, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge in Starship Enterprise, like USS Enterprise (NCC-1701-J), this'll make a good addition. Cenarium (talk) 15:55, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.