Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ISCT:ISCSI-Test-Tool
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 21:21, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- ISCSI Test Tool (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication that product is notable. PROD'ed twice, no 3rd party refs. Jclemens (talk) 19:09, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Agree with nominator. Could not find any sources on searching that show the product as notable -- Raziman T V (talk) 19:11, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 21:47, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep – I admit my POV may be subjective, but I use this tool every day at work for a Fortune 50 company. The article needs a lot of work to conform to WP standards, but this does not justify a delete !vote (dude, loose the images in the article; uninteresting). —Aladdin Sane (talk) 00:59, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The subject needs to have significant coverage by reliable third party publications in order to be considered "notable" per Wikipedia standards. Said coverage is lacking. JBsupreme (talk) 07:37, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.