Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/INDK

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:14, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

INDK

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only notability is having members from other potentially notable bands. Choking Victim barely seems to pass muster, as do Leftöver Crack and some of these other acts, but this one doesn't meet notability outside its members. Also blatant COI. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 01:58, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:24, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This looks like a question of whether WP:BAND applies recursively. If the other bands are notable, the members are notable (per #6), but not "independently notable", so this fails WP:BAND. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:04, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:19, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- no notability demonstrated in any source, and no sources to support the claims. N2e (talk) 04:08, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Link: http://www.tentcityrecords.com/ gives full info on band, this label helped produce their first album. Their full length was through GO Kart records. While not well known, INDK does have an international fan base-however small that may be- and is well known through the spin off bands. They had a song on the Major indie lable Epitaph Records sampler. -Signed KermitCrack, not signed in- —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.17.63.203 (talk) 05:52, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.