Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IMediaMatrix

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete both. Kimchi.sg 04:48, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

IMediaMatrix[edit]

Obvious spam for a start-up company (created by, big surprise, User:Imediamatrix) that gets all of 24 unique Google hits (out of 77 total). Also you can add company founder Ahmed Gomaa, who does not appear to be the historian of the same name [1]. Calton | Talk 00:14, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, blatant advert. Fe e zo (Talk) 00:59, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Both NN, spam --Steve _(Slf67)^talk 01:00, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, possibly speedy under advert and bio, respectively. Dooms Day34 9 01:08, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, spam. Probably could have been db-spam'd. --- RockMFR 01:10, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as blatant advertising. Ditto for the bio. Ultra-Loser Talk / Contributions 01:11, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete — Definitely spam and advertising. Not notable at all. –- kungming·2 | ^(Talk·^Contact) 01:15, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. For the record, I declined to delete this under db-spam; I think the purpose in placing the article here was for advertising, but its content wasn't unsalvageable. Anyway, changed to prod but it was removed with no real effort to address the issues. Mango juice^talk 01:16, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete IMediaMatrix as spam. The corporate single purpose account is a very strong indicator of blatant spam. So tagged. As for the founder, delete - fails WP:BIO. MER-C 01:29, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete spam, advert and btw there's a speedy on it.--John Lake 01:31, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete vanispamcruftisement (G11) Danny Lilithborne 04:31, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.