Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IFunny
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:27, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- IFunny (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Procedural nomination. Singularity42 (talk · contribs) PRODed it with the comment "Non-notable app". I have removed the PROD and nominated here instead because I thought that there may be objections. It's actually a pretty popular application, but that is irrelevant here. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 19:55, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete due to lack of notability. Singularity42 (talk) 20:02, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Widely ignored by reliable sources. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 20:17, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:30, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:31, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – not detailed by reliable sources, therefore no notability either. —MelbourneStar☆talk 04:48, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as lacking in-depth coverage in reliable independent sources. Stuartyeates (talk) 01:37, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.