Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IDV Solutions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:15, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IDV Solutions[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been through quite a bit and has improved at times but I'm concerned that my searches found nothing additional and good sources, searches here, here, here and here. Although some may consider this notable, I'm not sure if the awards can fully save this. SwisterTwister talk 05:38, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 02:07, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 02:07, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 02:07, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:39, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no clear indication of importance and unclear article: the infobox says they do GIS; the lede paragraph of article says they do business intelligence & risk visualization, the programs they describe are a sort of hybrid. The awards are minor. The refs are not substantial. DGG ( talk ) 21:48, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom and DGG. Searches did not turn up anything to meet the notability requirements. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:00, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - software article of unclear notability, lacking significant coverage in independent sources. Refs are regurgitated press releases, minor awards, and incidental mentions in larger lists of software. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 21:57, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.