Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ICups

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 23:25, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ICups

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An advert of a nonnotable practical joke prodict, which made a minor blip in the media in Fall 2014. Noted merely by association with iPhone. Notability not inherited. No lasting importance, hence no encyclopedic value Staszek Lem (talk) 22:27, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:22, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:22, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, so a "redirect/merge" to Tin can telephone not an option? Coolabahapple (talk) 06:16, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- It was a single-month amusing news and no lasting interest. Staszek Lem (talk) 19:51, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:12, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:56, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, "Helloooo, is anyone there?...", drat, i don't think my icup's working. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:23, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. If Wikipedia had a criterion for being funny, it'd fail that too, but it doesn't. Anyway, it would not be out of place to Merge whatever can be salvaged into the section on Reception of the real product. -The Gnome (talk) 19:35, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.