Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IC reverse design

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 21:36, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

IC reverse design

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article appears to be written for advertising purposes. See the Talk:IC_reverse_design Page. It also appears to be duplicate content that is covered under Reverse_engineering and does not require its own article. User226 17:20, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I was not sure if this met section G11 for speedy deletion. It may very well be a speedy delete. User226 (talk) 17:30, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 19:59, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 19:59, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete speedy or not, it appears to be only a link to a company that pirates intellectual property. Nothing to merge. Maybe lawyers' opinion needed on if this kind of thing could even lead to a lawsuit, which would certainly justify a speedy. W Nowicki (talk) 17:22, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This is badly translated material from what appears to be a Chinese wiki. From a topic standpoint, we already cover the material in reverse engineering. -- Whpq (talk) 16:23, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.