Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ICFAI University, Tripura

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 16:18, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ICFAI University, Tripura[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Largely PROMO for the university, with large chunks of text non-sourced, rest of the sourcing is primary or simple lists or legislative texts. I find no external coverage of the institution itself, only of students having won xyz award. Oaktree b (talk) 14:33, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and India. Oaktree b (talk) 14:33, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete tendentiously edited by paid editor, blatant advertising and fails WP:NORG. Theroadislong (talk) 14:47, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Very promotional however may not meet G11. But anyways fails WP:NORG. Nagol0929 (talk) 15:48, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tripura-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:54, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Almost every one of the 66 references I’ve found are promotional, and possible WP:UPE involvement. HarukaAmaranth ^春 _香 20:32, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
From 66 I've found some are promotional but not entirely many of them have cited for reference which looks ok. We should make some changes to it so it follows the guidelines of Wikipedia and in a neutral point of view KujoJoske (talk) 06:30, 3 November 2023 (UTC):Note:This user has made no other edits on Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 08:10, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Which do you consider as valid, please present your top 3 here so we can review. Oaktree b (talk) 12:28, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - sources invariably fail either WP:ORGIND or WP:ORGDEPTH or both Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:47, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
~~:There are "n" number of articles similar to this but there isn't a single issue with them. Why? KujoJoske (talk) 11:23, 3 November 2023 (UTC)~~WP:SOCKSTRIKE Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:14, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

By all means, if there are other articles on organisations that fail requirements, you can request their deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:24, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please tag them for deletion as well, we need to review them Oaktree b (talk) 12:27, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

~~Please search with the keywords like University, University in India, Institute in India, Institute, Colleges and check the articles published KujoJoske (talk) 12:37, 3 November 2023 (UTC)~~[reply]

~~I'm surprised many of prominent institute have cited poor source and blatantly advertising and no actions have been taken that's seems very suspicious. KujoJoske (talk) 12:43, 3 November 2023 (UTC)~~WP:SOCKSTRIKE Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:14, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Please keep the discussion here to the article at hand. You can nominate any articles for deletion that you feel are invalid, on their pages. Oaktree b (talk) 14:27, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Socks are out in full force today. It does seem suspicious yes, thank you Mr. Sock. I wondered why it was so interesting to you. Oaktree b (talk) 16:43, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:03, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. We have always kept universities established by state legislation. The quality of the article is irrelevant to the notability of the topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:03, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
WP:TNT. Always better then SPAM. The Banner talk 16:32, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete tendentiously edited by paid editor, blatant advertising and fails WP:NORG. The Banner talk 16:32, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.