Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IButton
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to 1-Wire. deleting and restoring the redirect Spartaz Humbug! 20:57, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- IButton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
iPhone game with no third party coverage provided or found. No coverage for the redlinked Midnight Labs who makes it either.
Note: there are other apparently notable products called iButton so beware of false positives when looking for sources ThaddeusB (talk) 19:13, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- After closer examination, I notice that the article used to point to 1-Wire before being hijacked. As such, I recommend that redirect be restored if the page is deleted. --ThaddeusB (talk) 19:16, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this game. Joe Chill (talk) 21:31, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Lack of N + V = DEL Rafablu88 21:57, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 22:48, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Revert to Redirect, not notable, however this article was originally a redirect to something completely unrelated which seems plausible. Rather than deleting it, it would be better to simply restore it's original valid use. --Taelus (talk) 10:56, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Revert to Redirect: It might have been more appropriate to discuss reverting the article back into a redirect on its talk page instead of nominating it for deletion, though not as many eyeballs would see the discussion there and it would have been harder to get a consensus. The current article's subject is non-notable. Narthring (talk • contribs) 23:46, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Yah, unfortunately I didn't notice that until after I created the AfD or I would have just reverted to redirect myself. Sorry. --ThaddeusB (talk) 00:49, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.