Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'm a Celebrity...Get Me Out of Here! (UK series 13)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. I wasn't comfortable about speedying the article when I first reviewed it, but after trying to verify some of the participants I think db-hoax is probably a fair outcome. Basalisk ^{inspect damage}⁄_berate 10:46, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a Celebrity...Get Me Out of Here! (UK series 13)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unsourced content announcing a television program 11 months ahead when no such schedule exists. —Theo polisme 19:23, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: unsourced. FeatherPluma (talk) 20:03, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - clearly a test edit. Seems to satisfy speedy G2 or G3 since the content is pure unpublished fabrication as opposed to unsourced speculation. Leaky Caldron 20:18, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete. No content. Unconfirmed series, won't be for almost another year if it does happen. –anemone projectors– 20:44, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. WP:FUTURE Mkdw ^talk 20:56, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete Appears to be a test edit. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 23:27, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, but not speedily - I don't believe this qualifies under any criteria for CSD; WP:FUTURE is not a criterion, there is content, and I don't believe it was a test edit. That said, I do believe it violates WP:NOTCRYSTAL and it is unsourced, so I would still support deletion, but not under any of the CSD criteria. Go Phightins! 23:43, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is quite clearly a test edit and qualifies under G2. There is not one scintilla of published evidence linking any of these celebrities to a programme which, even if it is broadcast in 10 months time, guards it's contestants details until the broadcast date. The author has simply made up a hypothetical list and presented it in article form for a programme that is not yet scheduled. Leaky Caldron 23:48, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless of the merits of G1/2, does {{db-hoax}} not apply here? —Theo polisme 03:51, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.