Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'll Lead You Home

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep as the nominator has withdrawn the nomination and no one other than the nominator had recommended that the page be deleted. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 07:03, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll Lead You Home[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NALBUM or WP:GNG Boleyn (talk) 08:49, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:53, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:53, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Could the nom please explain why they believe this album does not meet WP:NALBUM or WP:GNG? This was, according to Allmusic and Billboard ([1], [2]) "the highest-debuting Christian album in chart history", reaching #16 on the Billboard 200 and topping the 'Top Contemporay Christian' chart, and selling 51,500 copies in "the CBA market alone". The album won a Grammy Award in the 'Best Pop-Contemporary Gospel Album' category ([3], [4]). The album received further coverage in USA Today, Dayton Daily News. The associated tour received coverage from Billboard, Encyclopedia of Contemporary Christian Music, Sun Sentinel, The Pantagraph, Dallas Morning News. The title track received further coverage from The Charlotte Observer. So why did you find none of this and how did you come to the conclusion that this album is not notable? --Michig (talk) 12:42, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep - nomination withdrawn Thanks for the grat research and improvement made, Michig. Boleyn (talk) 16:37, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.