Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hypocritical paradox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:34, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hypocritical paradox[edit]

This page does not describe a notable class of statements; it also has no sources that previous described such statements and is therefore original research. The page also fails to describe a paradox. By saying this, I do not mean that one of the apparently true possibilities is obviously false. In fact, there is only one possibility: The speaker hates himself. Superm401 - Talk 05:11, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: It is not a paradox, not does it have any connection with philosophy. It's just an incongruity. I think it's fine if it's included in Wikipedia, but I'd want to verify whether 'hypocritical paradox' is actually the name comedians use for it. Peter Grey 05:23, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete'. Looks to be original research. Herostratus 13:59, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Googling didn't shed any light. I too think it's original research. --Ricaud 16:37, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. ¡Dustimagic! ^(T/C) 21:28, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per above Nigelthefish 19:18, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.