Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hussainabad block

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sandstein 18:25, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hussainabad block

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks references and is of poor quality. I'm not sure how to clean it up, and it would need a lot of work to stay around. Almost no citations. Ender The Xenocide | ( Talk | Contribs) 23:21, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 18:39, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Nothing in the nomination statement constitutes a policy-compliant reason for deletion. Phil Bridger (talk) 22:08, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article is a verified article on a geographic subdivision, which qualifies it as notable. The lack of references and need for cleanup should be addressed by maintenance tags (or actual maintenance), not deletion. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 22:57, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - verified article on geographic subdivision,--BabbaQ (talk) 14:31, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

~~Speedy redirect -- Isn't this article just Hussainabad, Jharkhand but under a different name (and badly written)?~~

if the article has verified sources it shouldnt be merged.--BabbaQ (talk) 19:12, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If it's a duplication of an existing topic, it must be.--Yaksar (let's chat) 19:25, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Scratch that, it's different. Stubbify and keep--Yaksar (let's chat) 19:47, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.