Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Husky beagle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 13:47, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Husky beagle

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The second source is completely misattributed and a Google search finds nothing attributable. Cavalryman (talk) 11:41, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Two "references" only. The Encyclopedia Britannica reference makes no mention of this dog so it can be discounted. The other reference is supposedly in the dogs of the Iditarod, which is equally doubtful because a search in Google Books on this dog does not furnish this book, nor any book! A Google search brings up four unWP:RELIABLE "my-little-doggie" type websites, which probably gave rise to this article. William Harristalk 12:14, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:15, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The AKC recognizes 193 breeds so I suppose there are about 37,000 theoretical cross-breeds among them (minus chihuahua–great dane, etc. I suppose). Very, very few of them need a separate article beyond a listing at List of dog crossbreeds. Reywas92^Talk 18:07, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.