Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Husin Mugni

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:59, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Husin Mugni

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article created due to playing one game in the league and 3 minutes in the cup several years ago. No significant coverage cited and GSA and Football Database also confirm that the WP:NFOOTBALL pass is extremely weak and trivial. In terms of WP:GNG, I found this local news article, which is basically just a quote from him and contains little independent content. An Indonesian source search was unsuccessful in finding independent WP:RS. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:43, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one or two appearances is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:39, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet any reasonable inclusion criteria. I was really hoping the proposal to up to 3 games the minimum inclusion criteria where it is currently at one would pass, but some editors seem t oppose any change, and some are willing to fight good in hope of getting better, so I fear than change will not happen anytime soon. As I said elsewhere this one game standard would be like if we considered any academic notable who had been the teacher of record for at least one class in a fully accredited university that has graduate programs.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:12, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.