Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hunt, Idaho

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 21:10, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hunt, Idaho (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is another really bizarre GNIS case, but this time I don't think we can blame the compilers. A 1946 aerial shows the problem plainly: the construction of the internment camp wiped out everything here, not just the area covered by the present park. In particular, the area where the label sits in the topos is covered by a complex of barracks-style buildings. The topos do not go back this far, but what they do show has no correspondence with the aerials to speak of, though the style of the maps shows that they were updated some time after the war. The park service website is no help that I can readily find, and the camp completely dominates searching, so that while I can find it being called the "Hunt camp", I've been unable to get any info about what was here before. I'm somewhat reluctant to redirect this to the camp article, and "unincorporated rural community" is yet another euphemism for "we don't know what was here, but there's nothing there now." Mangoe (talk) 18:30, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:48, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Idaho-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:48, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:49, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.