Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hungarian calendar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete – Gurch 13:23, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Hungarian calendar

It seems to be a promotion of an original research. Internet search did not show any reference to this bizar theory but the author's online book. Mgar 09:42, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

• Weak delete unless more convincing sources can be provided. There are a lot of crackpot scientific theories around, often supported only by their creators. The second link to archeometry.org makes more convincing arguments, but harpoons its own theories by stating that the accuracy of historical records of the timing and locations of eclipses makes it hard to confirm this theory, and ultimately that other factors can account for any apparent discrepancy. ~ Matticus78 12:01, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Borderline weak keepChanged to delete or at most merge into Phantom time hypothesis, which is quite a notable crackpot-science phenomenon. Don't know how notable this particular hypothesis is in its contexts, as the article doesn't make that very clear. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:02, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Changed to delete as per Artw below; notability of this particular crackpot theory is unimpressive. Fut.Perf. ☼ 05:17, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

• delete - this theory only seems to appear in a 2004 "e-book". Artw 22:49, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• delete per Artw. Szia. --Starionwolf 04:31, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
• merge and/or rename "Hungarian calendar hypothesis".

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.