Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hung Suen Wing Chun Kung Fu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:25, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hung Suen Wing Chun Kung Fu[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable and un-referenced (references point to something else). It also looks like a copyvio. I was going to delete all of the OR stuff but then there is nothing left.Peter Rehse (talk) 12:05, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 12:05, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I found no significant coverage. Fails WP:N. SL93 (talk) 23:17, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unsourced article with no indications of notability. Much of the article is spent explaining where the name of this relatively new style came from, but there's no indication of any linkage of this style with its historical namesake. My search found no significant coverage of this wing chun variant. Papaursa (talk) 00:00, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.