Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hundred years of indian cinema

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 17:41, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hundred years of indian cinema[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Rehash of Cinema of India written in a somewhat inappropriate tone. Jamesx12345 (talk) 19:41, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 20:14, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 20:14, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Redundant to Cinema of India, and very essay-like. DoctorKubla (talk) 20:46, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No strong enough reason...

I can't understand that there is no strong enough resion that this script should be deleted. That's why it should not be deleted. else you are experienced and as you wish. Mala chaubey (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:40, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. If there is any info in it that isn't in Cinema of India then that could be merged into the later article. MarnetteD | Talk 18:53, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This is the cinema of India, but written as an essay; duplicates and existing topic. -- Whpq (talk) 20:24, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This article should not be deleted. I was surprised that it didn't come in the news at Main Page. Bollywood is the largest cinema of the world. I don't think above reason is sufficient to delete this article.☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 04:48, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Have you looked at the Cinema of India article? Everything that is in the "100 years" article is covered in this one and it is written in a proper manner. IMO there is no need to have two articles on the same subject. MarnetteD | Talk 05:03, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So it should be merged with Cinema of India.☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 09:15, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think should be merged? -- Whpq (talk) 11:50, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.