Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Humanities magnet
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 03:15, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Is this really at all notable on its own? It doesn't seem to provide any reasons for it, and would seem more useful merged and redirected to the Highschool's main article. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 01:32, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think it is an excellent idea to post a magnet program in Wikipedia especially when it should be recognized. for example, it is a college prep program that has helped many people. I believe that it can stand alone because there is and will be enough information to support it and back it up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KrazeLooney (talk • contribs)
- Wikipedia does not exist for the purpose of promoting the recognition of anything, however deserving. Wikipedia is about things that have achieved recognition already. Dpbsmith (talk) 18:16, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete CSD A8 copyvio. Schools are notable, but not as crufty as it is. If it detailed more about the actual school instead of blurb and a bell schedule, it could be a good article. Hobbeslover talk/contribs 04:00, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete May be notable but including a timetable is a strict no-no. --Srikeit(talk ¦ ✉) 05:55, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete might be notable, but current article reeks of advertising. Paddles TC 06:33, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as proposal. michaelCurtis talk+ contributions 09:32, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above (and current article very POV) Trebor 11:31, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Dpbsmith (talk) 18:14, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Article is useless, and subject not notable enough to justify trivial info. CP/M 22:40, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.